Volume of brake fluid

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Kurt in S.A.
Posts: 1647
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: Volume of brake fluid

Post by Kurt in S.A. »

By not absorbing water, DOT 5 lets the moisture condense out where it can attack the inside of the master cylinder. DOT 5.1 is glycol based and would work, but it's not really buying you that much for everyday use. Stick with DOT 3/4...it's proven in our bikes.

Kurt in S.A.
daz
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:07 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Volume of brake fluid

Post by daz »

I'm with barryh. There is no mess with using gravity. I end up squirting brake fluid all over the garage using a syringe!
1971 R50/5, 1980 R100T,
CRF 300 Rally, CRF 250F,
1947 James ML
barryh
Posts: 730
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Volume of brake fluid

Post by barryh »

Kurt in S.A. wrote: Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:39 am DOT 5.1 is glycol based and would work, but it's not really buying you that much for everyday use. Stick with DOT 3/4...it's proven in our bikes.
I agree. DOT 5.1 has a higher temperature rating but it's also more hygroscopic than DOT 4 so will need to be changed more often. We have no need for the higher performance of DOT 5.1 on an airhead so the net result for all practical purposes is that it's inferior to DOT 4.
barry
Cheshire
England
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1815
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Volume of brake fluid

Post by melville »

Zombie Master wrote: Sun Jan 17, 2021 5:47 am Why didn't Dot 5 (silicone) brake fluid gain acceptance? It's not corrosive, doesn't absorb water, seems to me it should be a better product for street bikes.
Harley specified it for years. But not lately--it's apparently incompatible with ABS.

There is now a DOT 5.1, but it's not a silicone fluid.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
Post Reply