Rocker Boxes

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Nourish
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:15 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Rocker Boxes

Post by Nourish »

Hello. Will the R50/2 type rocker boxes fit the later /7 airheads?
Deleted User 62

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Well, while they do share the same valve cover gasket, the /2 cover is about 1/2" shallower, so I'm guessing there won't be enough room for the rockers. On the other hand, the /5 valve covers would work.
User avatar
DanielMc
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:17 am
Location: England

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by DanielMc »

I'm no expert, but if you take a photograph of the post you're posting on the forum and then post the photograph of that post in the post you just posted isn't there a risk of damaging the space time continuum?
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers might not be able to tell the difference." Samuel Clemens
Deleted User 72

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by Deleted User 72 »

DanielMc wrote:I'm no expert, but if you take a photograph of the post you're posting on the forum and then post the photograph of that post in the post you just posted isn't there a risk of damaging the space time continuum?
Not if you use the /5 valve covers. They cover all models.
ME 109
Posts: 7306
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by ME 109 »

DanielMc wrote:I'm no expert, but if you take a photograph of the post you're posting on the forum and then post the photograph of that post in the post you just posted isn't there a risk of damaging the space time continuum?
Great Scott Daniel!
Your'e right!
Nourish's clock appears to be fronzen at 8:43.
Now what?
Lord of the Bings
Deleted User 62

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by Deleted User 62 »

DanielMc wrote:I'm no expert, but if you take a photograph of the post you're posting on the forum and then post the photograph of that post in the post you just posted isn't there a risk of damaging the space time continuum?
:shock: "Never argue with a fool, onlookers might not be able to tell the difference." Just kidding, and if I did indeed tear the fabric of space time, it's really no problem: I have a roll of one sided quantum string reinforced membrane uh... duck tape...
Last edited by Deleted User 62 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:53 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Nourish
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:15 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by Nourish »

Thanks for the replies- but aren't the /5 rocker boxes much the same as the /6's?
Deleted User 62

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Nourish wrote:Thanks for the replies- but aren't the /5 rocker boxes much the same as the /6's?
Yep, same thing, different year. At least BMW got that part right...
User avatar
twist
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by twist »

OK, on a slightly different note but concerning the same area, is there an advantage to be had by polishing the rockers? Are there areas that could be ground down/chase casting and polish? I can only think that polishing would aid in making the rockers smooth and oil would move better over them. Am I missing something?
ME 109
Posts: 7306
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Rocker Boxes

Post by ME 109 »

twist wrote:OK, on a slightly different note but concerning the same area, is there an advantage to be had by polishing the rockers? Are there areas that could be ground down/chase casting and polish? I can only think that polishing would aid in making the rockers smooth and oil would move better over them. Am I missing something?
There ain't much oil flow in there to speed up.
Lord of the Bings
Post Reply