I am spending my Easter Sunday fitting a R100S top end to my R100/7. Its a nice religious way to spend the day I think, Gott im Himmel!
Exhaust valve seats have little chips out of them, on the inner edge of the taper. They don't cut right across and I managed to lap the valves OK. Just wondering what might cause that. The engine eaten something hard?
S pistons appear to be the original items. My Haynes manual reckons they would be 9.5:1 compression, as opposed to the 9:1 ratio of the /7. The /7 though is on second oversize, so they could be anything. I haven't got the /7 heads off yet, but is there an easy way of telling? Will it be obvious from the crown?
It would be nice if I could just swap heads.
cheers and happy easter
Mal
R100S top end
Re: R100S top end
Mal, in a discussion awhile back, it was noted that the S pistons have higher domes and have more "defined" valve pockets. Sorry, the forum won't let me add a picture, but you can see more here: http://boxerworks.com/forum2/viewtopic. ... 211#p50195
Re: R100S top end
Thanks Tim. I took the heads off the /7 and yes I can see the difference on the pistons, the S appears to be domed a couple mm higher, its the deeper valve pockets that give it away.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:34 am
Re: R100S top end
Actually the R100S came with at least two different piston configurations, maybe three or four.
* 1977 to early 1978 - 9.5-1 - with a pronounced peripheral squish band
* 1978 (later) on - 9.5-1 - with a hemispherical dome that extends to the periphery of the piston
And by now, many of these bikes have been retrofitted with other pistons, perhaps most commonly with the flat-topped 8.5-1 pistons that became the standard in later BMW bikes as leaded gas was phased out.
The 1977 /7 had 9.0-1 pistons with a nice squish band but also, if I recall correctly, the smaller inlet valves, so be careful to check both pocket depth and radius.
I recently picked up the files showing some of the different pistons (which I used to host at my old home) so I'll put those back up on a server in this home, maybe later today.
* 1977 to early 1978 - 9.5-1 - with a pronounced peripheral squish band
* 1978 (later) on - 9.5-1 - with a hemispherical dome that extends to the periphery of the piston
And by now, many of these bikes have been retrofitted with other pistons, perhaps most commonly with the flat-topped 8.5-1 pistons that became the standard in later BMW bikes as leaded gas was phased out.
The 1977 /7 had 9.0-1 pistons with a nice squish band but also, if I recall correctly, the smaller inlet valves, so be careful to check both pocket depth and radius.
I recently picked up the files showing some of the different pistons (which I used to host at my old home) so I'll put those back up on a server in this home, maybe later today.
Re: R100S top end
Great! What is a "pronounced peripheral squish band" ?
Re: R100S top end
"per-if-err-all"Mal S7 wrote:Great! What is a "pronounced peripheral squish band" ?

I've spent most of my money on women, motorcycles, and beer.
The rest of it I just wasted.
The rest of it I just wasted.
-
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm
Re: R100S top end
nyuck nyuckdougie wrote:"per-if-err-all"Mal S7 wrote:Great! What is a "pronounced peripheral squish band" ?
A flat band around the edge of the piston to "squish" the mixture against a similar flat band on the head. If the dome goes all the way to the edge of the piston, then it has no "squish band."
MS - out
Re: R100S top end
Oh brilliant!
I have purr-iff-err-al squish band.
What's it do?
I have purr-iff-err-al squish band.
What's it do?
-
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm
Re: R100S top end
Oh, and increased combustion chamber turbulence. This gives a more complete burn, and helps prevent detonation.
It is supposed to promote better heat transfer to the head as well, but I've never understood how that worked.
It is supposed to promote better heat transfer to the head as well, but I've never understood how that worked.
MS - out