Rear drive question:

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Chuey »

On the ribbed rear drives that I have, they have a steel sleeve surrounding the stud. The sleeve is 15mm in diameter and sits proud about 1.5mm of the spot faced surface allowed for the shock.

Garnet is right. Though, mine will look a bit different. I'll share a picture when it is further along.

Chuey

PS (edit) Any guesses as to what the structure is made of?
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Garnet »

Garnet

Image
User avatar
StephenB
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:39 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by StephenB »

Chuey wrote:Has anyone here removed the stud to which the rear shock is attached? How would that be done? How is it retained in the unit?

Final drive in question: 1983 R100

Thanks,

Chuey

Threaded in, will simply come out with two nuts locked against each other.
Some of the above is fact, some is fiction, some is my personal imagination and some is just simple truth. [me]
http://www.stephenbottcher.net
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Chuey »

Thanks, Garnet and Stephan. That's what I needed to know. Onward!

By the way, those three pictures were very inspirational!

Chuey
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Major Softie »

Chuey wrote: Chuey

PS (edit) Any guesses as to what the structure is made of?

You are NOT building a rear suspension out of wood!






are you?
.
.
.
MS - out
Deleted User 72

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Deleted User 72 »

Major Softie wrote:
You are NOT building a rear suspension out of wood!






are you?
.
.
.
Maybe...
Image
Deleted User 62

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Garnet wrote:Image
Is it just me, or does the lower mount for that shock look like a failure waiting to happen? The shock should be mounted in line with the U-shaped piece, IMO.
robert
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by robert »

Sure would be better.
User avatar
Jeff in W.C.
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:20 am
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Jeff in W.C. »

Tim Shepherd wrote: Is it just me, or does the lower mount for that shock look like a failure waiting to happen? The shock should be mounted in line with the U-shaped piece, IMO.
You mean more like what Vanzen did or is doing. I hope he doesn't mind me posting the photo from his site. It is available for anyone to see on his site.

Image

There's more on his site.
http://www.framecrafters.net/show-project.php?id=35
Jeff in W.C.
1988 R100 RT
2018 R1200 GS
"I've got my motorcycle jacket, but I'm walking all the time." Joe Strummer/Clash
Deleted User 62

Re: Rear drive question:

Post by Deleted User 62 »

That's better still, but if it was mine I'd want it in line with the brace, not attached to the top of it.
Last edited by Deleted User 62 on Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply