bent forks R75/5

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

Yes, 82-84

Photo of the machined damper rods

Image
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
Bamboo812
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:45 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Bamboo812 »

Thanks! Just to confirm, it's part # 31 42 1 241 649 "guide ring" correct? Image
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

That looks like it
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
Bamboo812
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:45 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Bamboo812 »

Another question Charles, do you recall if the groove was just machined wider to fit the new ring, or was it also made deeper as well? It's the last thing we need to do to get my friends R100/7 back on the road!
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

I think that the groove was not deepened, I would machine it wider to take the plastic ring and then fit. On my bike it's a fairly loose fit, the ring not compressed much.
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
daz
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:07 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by daz »

Ok, so probably a dumb question: So why not decrease the width of the new plastic ring? I have to believe that would require less machining than the steel damper rods. Maybe even use abrasive paper on a sheet of glass for the plastic.
1971 R50/5, 1980 R100T,
CRF 300 Rally, CRF 250F,
1947 James ML
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

Image
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
Bamboo812
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:45 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Bamboo812 »

daz wrote:Ok, so probably a dumb question: So why not decrease the width of the new plastic ring?
I think the plastic (nylon?) rings are wider because they will wear faster than the thinner steel rings.
User avatar
bbelk
Posts: 1722
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by bbelk »

Airbear wrote: a bingle with a cow
I liked the way that sounded so much that I had to google it and I will be forever greatfull because I found this:

Image
1975 R90/6
1979 R65
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4910
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by SteveD »

Ahhh...Lara! An airhead in the vacuous sense! There are other similarities to our favourite bikes too! :lol: ;)
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Post Reply