Page 2 of 2
Re: R100 vs R65
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:12 am
by barryh
"spongy pudd handling"
I wouldn't worry that you are at any great disadvantage with the handling. A twin shock R45/R65 handles very well if the dampers are OK. In terms of feeling quick and nimble they are a revelation compared to an R100.
Re: R100 vs R65
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:02 am
by Rob
Yes, your twin-shock R65 still has a much better front end, and the front brake requires no adjustment, while you will get to learn to adjust the caliper on the /7.
You also have electronic ignition and a MUCH MORE organized wiring harness on the R65.
I repeat, keep the R65 for a little while.
OK, Brad - go for it! You owned both of these bikes!
Re: R100 vs R65
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 7:10 am
by Gibson
I was a long time R65 owner. All true. Great handling airhead. R100 will feel truck like at first. If you can hang onto the R65, Rob's advice is good. The R65 was a little cramped for me so I decided after 60k miles its was time to test other waters.
Re: R100 vs R65
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:45 am
by enigmaT120
I wasn't really pleased with the handling of my friend's R100 GSPD after riding my R65. But it's all relative: I'm not pleased with my R65's handling after I ride my Triumph. And my Triumph doesn't handle as well as my Salsa Fargo.
Re: R100 vs R65
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:17 am
by Gibson
So True!!