I'm Goin' In

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
User avatar
Ken in Oklahoma
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Ken in Oklahoma »

Ray from Indiana wrote:Thanks Ken but as I said earlier this a "bean can " w/o points bike, an 82 R100

Not in this thread. I actually looked before I posted. But no harm. Now countless people across the internet know how double images can happen on pre bean can ignitions--unless they read Duane's write up on the subject and they already knew.


Ken
____________________________________
There's no such thing as too many airheads
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Major Softie »

Ken in Oklahoma wrote:Now countless people across the internet know how double images can happen on pre bean can ignitions--unless they read Duane's write up on the subject and they already knew.
Ken
No number is more "countless" than zero. :mrgreen:
MS - out
Deleted User 62

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Major Softie wrote:
Ken in Oklahoma wrote:Now countless people across the internet know how double images can happen on pre bean can ignitions--unless they read Duane's write up on the subject and they already knew.
Ken
No number is more "countless" than zero. :mrgreen:
Zeros don't count?!?! I wish I had $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 for every time somebody said that! :lol:
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Garnet »

Tim Shepherd wrote:
Major Softie wrote:
Ken in Oklahoma wrote:Now countless people across the internet know how double images can happen on pre bean can ignitions--unless they read Duane's write up on the subject and they already knew.
Ken
No number is more "countless" than zero. :mrgreen:
Zeros don't count?!?! I wish I had $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 for every time somebody said that! :lol:
You could almost bail out the govermnet with that kinda money.
Garnet

Image
Deleted User 62

Re: "You could almost bail out the government etc"

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Well alrighty then, I'll print it myself!
Ray from Indiana
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:37 pm

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Ray from Indiana »

Well I posted on June 20 that I decided to change the timing chain on my 82R100. It was still very drivable but it looked as though the split timing image was talking to me, saying "change my chain". I ordered parts from Chicago BMW and got them about a month later. Parts I decided to just change whether needed or not were:
chain, engine sprocket, chain tensioner pads, tensioner spring, tensioner piston, timing chest seal, new woodruff key for the new sprocket.

The autopsy showed: 1) Very stretched chain compared to new 2) Engine sprocket with sharp teeth and a wierd angular wear pattern. 3) Tensioner pad under tensioner piston almost gone

Hardest part about the whole job was getting the old sprocket off. Turns out the power steering pump puller I had planned to use didn't have enough reach. My old 3 jaw puller had worn pulling surfaces - a chaepy anyway. Got a new puller ( strong like bull ) used the large hose clamp trick, heat tighten, more tighten, get pissed and then really torqued the puller and POW. She broke loose.

Getting the new fish clip on the new master link was a little tedious but with stuff that small what do we really expect?

I used momma's oven to get the new sprocket up to temp ( I used 300F ) and had to run to the garage with the sprocket in an old towel. Bam - slid righ on the first time. I set it with one tap of the hammer using a piece of 1-1/2" sch 80 pipe.

After re-timing the R100 is back to life. Runs MUCH better. Idles smoother, doesn't take as long to smooth out from cold.
No timing chest leaks yet, no stripped bolt holes, the new chect seal went in straight.

This was the first time I did a timing chain on an airhead and although time consuming and hard on the back ( no lift in my garage ) it wasn't that hard. I just had to go slow, working a little every night after work, and triple checking my own work.

Advice for people thinking about doing this job for the first time: Make sure your puller has a 4" reach. Use more heat than you think you need for pulling the sprocket off. Job is about a low to medium level of difficulty.
User avatar
Ken in Oklahoma
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Ken in Oklahoma »

Glad to hear it went well Ray. Thanks for the feedback. That's a job I think needs doing on my R100/7 and I've been dragging my feet. I'm feeling inspired, though I'm pretty sure the feeling will pass soon.


Ken
____________________________________
There's no such thing as too many airheads
User avatar
George Ryals
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Stone Mountain, GA

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by George Ryals »

Ray, when I tackle a job like yours for the first time, I always plan to do it just like you did. Do a little, sleep on it, think about the next step, do it in my head, think of all that can go wrong then do the next step. Sometime it goes so smooth it's like you've done it dozens of times. Almost never a disaster using the slow and steady method with mental rehearsal.
Smile it's contagious!
'74 R90S, '67 /2 Conv w/sc, '66 R50/2
'74 Harley FXE, '72 Harley FLH w/HD sc
'69 BSA 441 Victor Special, '74 R90/6 Basket case
'85 R80RT wreck for parts
User avatar
Ken in Oklahoma
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: I'm Goin' In

Post by Ken in Oklahoma »

George Ryals wrote:Ray, when I tackle a job like yours for the first time, I always plan to do it just like you did. Do a little, sleep on it, think about the next step, do it in my head, think of all that can go wrong then do the next step. Sometime it goes so smooth it's like you've done it dozens of times. Almost never a disaster using the slow and steady method with mental rehearsal.

That's a good point and a good formula. And to it I would add beware of tiredness and/or crankiness moving you away from the formula.


Ken
____________________________________
There's no such thing as too many airheads
Post Reply