Page 2 of 2

Re: QUESTION REGARDING TIRE BALANCING

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 1:54 pm
by Ken in Oklahoma
justoneoftheguys wrote:
You mean like this, Ken?

Yep, kinda like that, but none of those guys, including me, look very delighted. Honest, no wheels or bystanders were hurt during the balancing of the wheel. Everything came out fine and Stephen never crashed his bike.

Too bad Randy didn't take a close up shot, anticipating that somebody would want to see it some day. ;)

And IIRC Duane had his Parnes balancer along and liked his better. Whodathunkit?

Re: QUESTION REGARDING TIRE BALANCING

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:23 pm
by Major Softie
moonbeamerll wrote:I guess I'll just have to bolt the thing on and hope for the best. In a effort to keep insurance costs reasonable, I'm scheduled to take a Motorcycle Safety course this Saturday in OKC. Surely everything won't fly apart from Luther to the City and back.
Maybe. Running a wheel without balancing it is a crapshoot. You may be lucky and it may be close enough to have no problem. On the other hand, it may hop like crazy above 45 - 50 mph. You never know until you try. In the past, I've gotten lucky with rear wheels quite frequently, but only about 60% - 70% with fronts. So, on a front wheel, you may be fine, but there's a quite real chance that you will not.

Re: QUESTION REGARDING TIRE BALANCING

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:35 pm
by Deleted User 287
Ken in Oklahoma wrote: Too bad Randy didn't take a close up shot, anticipating that somebody would want to see it some day. ;)
Who knows what lurks in Randy's hard drive, that never made it to the final gallery?
Ken in Oklahoma wrote: And IIRC Duane had his Parnes balancer along and liked his better. Whodathunkit?
Isn't that the same Duane that doesn't think the BMW Factory = God? :P

Re: QUESTION REGARDING TIRE BALANCING

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:22 pm
by vanzen
justoneoftheguys wrote: Isn't that the same Duane that doesn't think the BMW Factory = God?
I knew there was a good reason why I like that guy !