My thought, too, on the % rather than a measured distance.Garnet wrote:As for sag figures, I would have thought that a percentage of travel rather than an imperial number would be more practical.
What I like will be will be @ 20%± - 30% ± of full travel,
the smaller percentage being more adequate to track / fast riding on smooth roads.
The % will also vary depending upon the specific shock / forks in question.
Obviously, since the forks typically will have longer travel than the rear shocks,
the measured distance for sag will be greater at the front.