R69s

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
User avatar
jagarra
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:42 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: R69s

Post by jagarra »

I agree with Chuey that the buyer is missing some marbles. I bet the transaction doesn't get completed with the receipt of payment and we see this bike again on the block.
I have been following the R6X models on e-bay just to see what they have been going for and it is possible this one would go in the neighborhood of 15K, but only if it had those old nice bags that were scuptered on the side.
Why they never addressed the crappy R69S logo is a mystery, not that thorough of a restoration if you miss something so visable.
As far as Suki and that picture of her on that BMW, one of my favorites. Very appealing.
1974 R90/6 built 9/73
1987 BMW K75S
1994 BMW R1100RS
1964 T100SR Triumph
1986 Honda XL600R
She'llbe
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:48 pm

Re: R69s

Post by She'llbe »

Someone has too many dollars and not enough sense!!!
From the desk of the
Mt. Nardi Yacht Club
PO BOX 95
Nimbin, NSW
Australia 2480
02-6689-1234
Deleted User 62

Re: R69s

Post by Deleted User 62 »

justoneoftheguys wrote:And the original Cadmium fasteners have been replaced with stainless - even though (they say) the fasteners came from Mobile Tradition. Do the Cadmium loose their ability to fend off corrosion after a while?
All the original 14mm fasteners on my R50/2 were solid pitted rust...
Deleted User 62

Big Bucks vs Small Change

Post by Deleted User 62 »

She'llbe wrote:Someone has too many dollars and not enough sense!!!
If you've got "too many dollars" you don't need cents... (sic) :roll:
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: R69s

Post by Garnet »

While trolling MaxBMW,s ebay site, looking for for this magical R69S, I found this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/BMW-HELLA-HEADL ... 3ccd68b2d6

If it is real it will go for a silly price as well.
Garnet

Image
lrz
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:01 am

Re: R69s

Post by lrz »

Well something happened because the item listing is totally gone,vanished; not listed as ended,etc.

I assume we'll see it up on the block again, though I'm sure Max & staff agreed wholeheartedly w/ the valuation.
moosehead
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:57 am
Location: Canukstan...north of the checkerboard

Re: R69s

Post by moosehead »

Think the bidder made a typo booboo....probably meant $13,000 not $130,000!!!!

Geez, if he didn't he's smoking something :o
Retired from work....not life!
barryh
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: R69s

Post by barryh »

Actually could have been a pretty smart move depending on how the vendor reacts.

Let's say the bidder was happy to pay $13,000. He then deliberatly adds the extra zero and now he can't be outbid by genuine bids of say up to $15,000. So wins the auction and says to the vendor "sorry mate I added the extra zero by mistake. Gets the bike for $13,000 when it might have gone to $15,000
barry
Cheshire
England
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4943
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: R69s

Post by SteveD »

moosehead wrote:Think the bidder made a typo booboo....probably meant $13,000 not $130,000!!!!
That was my initial thought and why I suggested he still had his gloves on when doing the bidding! :P
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Kurt in S.A.
Posts: 1657
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: R69s

Post by Kurt in S.A. »

Yeah, but, two different bidders typed $130K+!! The first one might have had gloves on...the second one must have been looking through his sunglasses...or doing it from his phone!!

Kurt in S.A.
Post Reply