Page 2 of 5
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:23 am
by Duane Ausherman
I have lots of used ones for sale that are straight. I have been selling them on eBay.
Are you willing to do the entire alignment procedure?
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:52 am
by SteveD
Duane, equipo5 is Ian. He'll be doing a complete front end sorting. He read Randy's article a while back.
The top plate is headed his way tomorrow if he's home.
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:10 pm
by Mal S7
I have replaced one tube due to chrome wear with an italian made one bought from motobins.
Quality seems good and it was cheaper and quicker to buy new than getting the old one re-chromed.
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:35 am
by equipo5
Are you willing to do the entire alignment procedure?
"Yes I am."
Rite of passage really. I would be delighted to buy your tubes Duane. Let me know how to proceed.
I have replaced one tube due to chrome wear with an italian made one bought from motobins.
Thanks for the feedback Mal.
Cheers
Ian
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:08 am
by jjwithers
chasbmw wrote:Various changes in ATE damper rods, mainly to improve damping and to reduce valve noise. Later would be better than /5 rods. But you can fit the later damper valve rings to the earlier forks.
i have been thinking about improving the stock /5 forks somehow but I don't want to go with Gold Valve emulators or anything like that.
I want to cure the 'dive' that can happen when braking but I don't want to stiffen the suspension too much (potholes are rampant here). Lately i have been wondering if throwing late 70's dampener and springs into /5 fork tubes would help.
Has anybody had any success with such a swap?
Or are there any other tricks to improve /5 fork handling? I'm not looking for race suspension, just less 'dive' and spongy effects yet able to swallow potholes.
-J
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:15 am
by ME 109
JJ, perhaps increasing the oil quantity in each for will assist?
Perhaps Duane can advise.
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:14 am
by Ken in Oklahoma
There are anti-dive springs that used to be marketed back in the day. IIRC they slipped over the damper rod. One of my airheads has them. I never did notice any significant difference, though I never made any real effort to determine if there actually was a difference.
Ken
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:16 am
by chasbmw
The later ATE forks can be set up to use with RT fairings et. Etc, so the damping is much better, if you pm me your email I will send you an article all about the changes in /6 forks. Don't renew the metal wiper rings as the ones produced are oversized and will cause fork stiction. I was chasing my tail for ages on this one and ended up getting the damper pistons machined for the later post 81 plastic piston seals, and my stiction was gone.
Many people reckon that part of the instability issues with /5 and early /6s was partly due to lack of damping in the forks.
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:22 am
by Ken in Oklahoma
chasbmw wrote:The later ATE forks can be set up to use with RT fairings et. Etc, so the damping is much better, if you pm me your email I will send you an article all about the changes in /6 forks. Don't renew the metal wiper rings as the ones produced are oversized and will cause fork stiction. I was chasing my tail for ages on this one and ended up getting the damper pistons machined for the later post 81 plastic piston seals.
Many people reckon that part of the instability issues with /5 and early /6s was partly due to lack of damping in the forks.
I find that interesting Charles. Would it be feasible to copy and past the info into a post here?
Ken
Re: bent forks R75/5
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:25 am
by chasbmw
Happy to send individually.....UK BMW club info and they are a bit precious about it