Re: More helmet debate
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:37 am
Freedom is very important to me as well. If we regulate everyone to comply with some idea of what constitutes safety, we may reduce injury, but will have even less freedom. I have pulled dead bodies out of a car or off the side of the road after ejection. A seat belt might have saved their lives. I remember one wreck, the driver was ejected when the Mustang convertible went airborne the first time at an estimated ton plus. She lived. The car landed upside down and she would have died with a seat belt. Her brother was under a guard rail maybe 50 yards down the road dead.
Cell phone use causes more wrecks than drunk driving, but the powers that be and the cell phone industry will not install an application to end all communications at more than walking speed. Many of us lived many years without a cell phone and the lack of instant communications did not mean the end of our lives.
Drunk drivers kill many innocent victims every day, but even when the US outlawed alcohol, the public ignored the law and the Volstead Act was repealed.
Laws to protect us from ourselves are written by people who want to limit other people's freedom without giving up those things they consider their rights.
Off the soap box and back to something productive.
Bob
Cell phone use causes more wrecks than drunk driving, but the powers that be and the cell phone industry will not install an application to end all communications at more than walking speed. Many of us lived many years without a cell phone and the lack of instant communications did not mean the end of our lives.
Drunk drivers kill many innocent victims every day, but even when the US outlawed alcohol, the public ignored the law and the Volstead Act was repealed.
Laws to protect us from ourselves are written by people who want to limit other people's freedom without giving up those things they consider their rights.
Off the soap box and back to something productive.
Bob