Page 2 of 5
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:50 am
by SteveD
Beatcha to it.
You know this belongs in viewtopic.php?f=3&t=325&start=130
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:26 am
by Rob
I don't know... I think it looks like a (slightly overweight?) guy with no shirt.
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:56 am
by ME 109
Rob wrote:I don't know... I think it looks like a (slightly overweight?) guy with no shirt.
Rob, in this situation there is only one thought. Female.
Let's not go anywhere else OK?
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 2:23 am
by Duane Ausherman
OK, now I see what all the fuss is about. I want to equivocally state that that is not Diane. Don't argue with me, I am dead sure about that.
That photo is funny.
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:17 am
by Ken in Oklahoma
Duane Ausherman wrote:OK, now I see what all the fuss is about. I want to equivocally state that that is not Diane. Don't argue with me, I am dead sure about that. . . .
Uh, that would be because Diane is opposed to photographing motorcycles?
Ken
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:11 am
by Sibbo
I wonder if she's selling a mirror or two?
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:46 am
by sterob
Duane Ausherman wrote:OK, now I see what all the fuss is about. I want to equivocally state that that is not Diane. Don't argue with me, I am dead sure about that.
That photo is funny.
I see we are in the 'weird' part of Boxerworks again........
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:32 am
by dwerbil
The bike has a nice set of jugs on it.
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:12 pm
by Scoots
Unfortunately, the seller, grumpybear2411, has no mirrors up for auction.
Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:19 pm
by Duane Ausherman
sterob wrote:Duane Ausherman wrote:OK, now I see what all the fuss is about. I want to equivocally state that that is not Diane. Don't argue with me, I am dead sure about that.
That photo is funny.
I see we are in the 'weird' part of Boxerworks again........
Should I have said unequivocally, not equivocally?