The Major wrote:
"Ohlins are an amazingly superior product, but I don't know if the general design of an Airhead warrants the expense."
Shock technology has changed both in terms of the versatility of the product – and, of course, the price.
In the olden days, one made a choice: "Comfort" or "Performance".
If a "performance shock" was desired, it would be a relatively stiff affair
(compression & rebound rates) to reduce wallowing at speed.
High speed stability would be the Holy Grail in this case.
Compliance ( and therefor comfort ) on irregular pavement suffered,
and this was accepted as a necessary compromise.
Koni ( and Ikon ) exemplify this old world compromise technology as a "performance" shock.
They were good in the day – but that was yesterday.
The Major states that Ohlins is a superior product. I'll second that thought.
Current technology has widened the "performance envelope"
to include rough road compliance
and high speed stability.
You can have your cake and eat it too –
but you will need to dust the moths off that wallet for the experience.
The felt difference of the new technology is not relegated to the track or new machines,
even as the complete adjustability ( of Ohlins, etal. ) is a blessing
best appreciated on the track.
Although Ohlins is presently at the top of the heap,
other manufacturers offer product with similar performance virtues, various adjustability features,
and a cheaper price-tag.
Proper spring rate will be the most overlooked feature of an MC shock –
Manufacturers ( BMW included )
assume an average rider weight and typical usage,
then fit their production machines with one shock to fit all.
Today, that one shock will be suited to more riders than back in the day –
But "Cheap" aftermarket shock manufacturers will still produce and sell the antiquated technology of yesterday.
