Sports Mufflers

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by Major Softie »

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:
...The reverse flow system gives the best ratio of sound reduction and performance,
and is the type of system used for all of our standard mufflers,
providing improved mid-range torque, dynamic response and reduced static back-pressure.
What the hell is "static back-pressure? It sounds like they're saying that it provides reduced back-pressure when there is no exhaust traveling through the exhaust. :lol:

Are they talking about under constant pressure, rather than the waves of pressure of actual exhaust production?
MS - out
rheritage
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:13 pm

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by rheritage »

Jeff,

Rich here, did you ever think you would get so much traffic on a simple question about "Sport Mufflers" . I learned a long time ago you're still the one that has to make the ultimate decision on what you like, after reviewing all the information the replies have provided make your call, which I think you already did. Sometimes it will be wrong, most times not but thats half the fun of figuring out what works for you and your bike.

By the way, love my Hoske's, LOL!!!

Let me know how you like them once you take delivery from Germany.
Rich Heritage - Savannah, GA
R75/5, R75/5 Vintage Racer, R100RS, 1100S BCR, 1150GSA
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by Chuey »

Man, those Staintune mufflers are beautiful! As I understand it, they can be had in a stock configuration which means quiteness same as stock. They fall under the category of "Buy the best and cry once."

Chuey
User avatar
boxertwinjeff
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:56 pm
Location: Cairns Qld, Australia.

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by boxertwinjeff »

rheritage wrote:Jeff,

Rich here, did you ever think you would get so much traffic on a simple question about "Sport Mufflers" . I learned a long time ago you're still the one that has to make the ultimate decision on what you like, after reviewing all the information the replies have provided make your call, which I think you already did. Sometimes it will be wrong, most times not but thats half the fun of figuring out what works for you and your bike.

By the way, love my Hoske's, LOL!!!

Let me know how you like them once you take delivery from Germany.
It happens now and then, am learning all the time C/O Boxerworks Forum.
I like the idea of experimenting with different Mufflers, it's all part of the fun of owning her, though I
love the sound of my Staintunes, and get comments on them now and then., and their keepers,
just feel I wanna Spice things up abit, I'm sure I'll like the Hoskes and will give a report on them.
In the future, may even grab a set of the Norton Megaphones, their relatively inexpensive.
1973 R1000/5 LWB
1976 R90S Silver Smoke
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4941
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: Staintune Mufflers

Post by SteveD »

Staintunes, but not the sport version.

Started from cold, full choke. Needed a carb balance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hdz-As6 ... lpage#t=5s
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by ME 109 »

Needs a load of outback red Aussie dust Steve, other than that all appears in order. :mrgreen:
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4941
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by SteveD »

ME 109 wrote:Needs a load of outback red Aussie dust Steve, other than that all appears in order. :mrgreen:

It's been a while since I've ventured to "outback" places Jeff. The last time was to Wilpena Pound and thereabouts, back in the 1980's. I did do the Nulla twice, but that was sealed by then. However I ventured along bits of the old Nullabor Hwy that could be seen from the new road. It must've taken a week or so to rattle across in those days!

After a high speed run from Hawker to somewhere I forget (heading home) the blood clot RS I was on was so badly pock marked on the fairing that it was almost more white than red across the lowers. That had a beautiful paint job before the ride. Shattered :cry: The trick was to avoid getting too close to the back of a road train! Hard way to learn.
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
User avatar
jjwithers
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: Ventura, CA
Contact:

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by jjwithers »

This has got to be the longest topic on boxerworks...ever! and i love it. I've learned a ton.

What about the idea of adding a baffle to 'tune' your exhaust on a BMW? Can it be done?
I ask for those running aftermarket short pipes, or straight pipes without mufflers. I'm wondering if you can install a baffle in the header pipe, or somewhere else to tune the flow a bit. There are dozens of baffle options out there.

And it would quiet a bike down a bit. If only the Harley guys would use them too....
www.beemersandbits.com
'77 R100S - http://www.joshuawithers.com/r100s
'73 /5 Toaster Cafe bike http://www.joshwithers.com/slash5
'67 Bridgestone 175 Hurricane Scrambler
'66 R60/2
'72 BMW 2002
Instagram - jj_withers
User avatar
vanzen
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:29 pm
Location: Hidin' in the Hills

not just about the noise anymore

Post by vanzen »

jjwithers wrote:This has got to be the longest topic on boxerworks...ever! and i love it. I've learned a ton.

What about the idea of adding a baffle to 'tune' your exhaust on a BMW? Can it be done?
I ask for those running aftermarket short pipes, or straight pipes without mufflers. I'm wondering if you can install a baffle in the header pipe, or somewhere else to tune the flow a bit. There are dozens of baffle options out there.
I would certainly not advise stuffing a baffle of any sort into a "header pipe".
As reason to dismiss such a concept,
let's start with the (now) accepted practice of increasing primary pipe diameter throughout it's length
in order to boost torque output throughout the RPMs.
Seems to me that adding a baffle into a header pipe
effectively reduces both the diameter and effective length (volume) of the system ...
To achieve what desired result ?

Greatly simplified basics:
Primary pipe diameter determines the RPM point at which torque peak will be produced.
This RPM becomes the "fulcrum" about which the torque curve pivots with changes of primary length.
Lengthening the primary pipe adds torque above that [established torque peak RPM]
and removes torque below that [established torque peak RPM].
Shortening primary pipe length adds torque below the RPM peak and removes it from above.

Hence, dragsters that operate at or near redline ONLY
will use large diameter short pipes.
Torque peak will be fixed at or near redline,
and torque delivery will be needed at those RPMs used before that torque peak / redline.

Road-race MCs typically run at high RPMs.
Torque peak will be tuned to BE THERE at these higher, most used, RPMs.
Primary length will be adjusted accordingly, and, typically,
with shorter primaries than will be found on a street MC
which typically needs to be able to operate at a range of lower RPMs ...

So, what works on an old air-head ?
Pretty much what the factory did:
38 mm diameter primary pipe to put the peak at a streetable RPM
and pipes long enough to balance torque delivery throughout usable RPMs –
and crossovers to fine-tune that torque curve.

At the risk of being redundant again ...
Any vehicle exhaust system will need to be designed and engineered for it's intended use.
The operative term may well be "engineered" –
Image
User avatar
jjwithers
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: Ventura, CA
Contact:

Re: Sports Mufflers

Post by jjwithers »

Excellent write up Vanzen. Thanks.
I wasn't asking as much because of the noise of the exhaust. It was more about the idea of 'tricking' the engine into thinking it had a longer exhaust system or more 'back pressure' by adding a baffle.
I agree, factory specs are the best... for everyday use. It was how the bike was designed.
www.beemersandbits.com
'77 R100S - http://www.joshuawithers.com/r100s
'73 /5 Toaster Cafe bike http://www.joshwithers.com/slash5
'67 Bridgestone 175 Hurricane Scrambler
'66 R60/2
'72 BMW 2002
Instagram - jj_withers
Post Reply