Re: Rennsport motor
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:01 pm
The early ten rapper engines were supercharged, not turbos. Then they changed the rules and outlawed superchargers after WW11. Charles
Holy Crap! We've had 11 World Wars?????chasbmw wrote:The early ten rapper engines were supercharged, not turbos. Then they changed the rules and outlawed superchargers after WW11. Charles
It's the US educational system that I blame.Major Softie wrote:Holy Crap! We've had 11 World Wars?????chasbmw wrote:The early ten rapper engines were supercharged, not turbos. Then they changed the rules and outlawed superchargers after WW11. Charles
Man, my history knowledge is SO behind...
Yeah, but this was pre-war! Maybe the fact that Germany lost the war (WWII)Garnet wrote:There where several English bikes with bevel drive OHC, the Norton Inter (Manx) be the most famous. Ducati did it all through the 60s and 70s but had problems at high revs.mattcfish wrote: A few things could be updated, but I guess the question is, why didn't this sort of design go into production? Seems to be way ahead of it's time.
Bevel drive is VERY expensive to build and re-build as there are many close tollerances that must be met.
According to Mick Walker in "BMW the Racing Story", Georg Meier's 500cc 1939 Kompressor Racer had 80bhp at 8,000 rpm with a top speed of 140mph (225kph) To give an idea of what a nice bit of kit it was, a R66 of 1938-41 had 597cc, but only 30bhp at 5,300rpm with a top speed of 90mph (145kph)!mattcfish wrote:What sort of power did these put out compared to stock engines of the time?
Base gaskets, head gaskets, and the need for precision gear alignment? Yep, that would be tough. Today, you'd make the base gaskets O-rings, but the head gaskets would still be tough.mattcfish wrote: I could see how pulling and reinstalling the heads could be complicated by the requirement for precise bevel gear lash.