Boxerworks.com

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –


talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...

I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.

R65 Rob wrote:

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –


talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...

I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.

Does that interfere with the manifesto? Thread degradation is what boxerworks hangs it's jugs on!

Yes, there is that.

The spring loaded driveshaft will retrofit to LWB /5, /6, and /7 bikes but the boss on the shaft that supports/stops the coupling mechanism will need a flat ground on each side equal to the diameter of the shaft so that it will fit through the narrow neck of the early swingarms. Easy to do on a belt sander. There is plenty of meat left to support the sprung coupling.

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –

talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...

It was a joke Vanzen.

R65 Rob wrote:

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...

I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.

Now that teo has kindly gotten the thread back on topic, do I still have to pay you to not move it to the speakeasy?

Steve in Golden wrote:

R65 Rob wrote:

vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...

I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.

Now that teo has kindly gotten the thread back on topic, do I still have to pay you to not move it to the speakeasy?

Since you just posted two more OT posts, you will have to pay double! (I work for the SUSG*)


*Secret U.S. Government