Bing Flat top carbs vs regular 32mm?

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Post Reply
User avatar
jjwithers
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: Ventura, CA
Contact:

Bing Flat top carbs vs regular 32mm?

Post by jjwithers »

I've never had a set of Flat Top carbs in my hands. I do think the look cool... but i know nothing about them.

Can somebody give me the quick lowdown on the advantages or disadvantages of them over a regular CV carb?

Thanks.

-josh
www.beemersandbits.com
'77 R100S - http://www.joshuawithers.com/r100s
'73 /5 Toaster Cafe bike http://www.joshwithers.com/slash5
'67 Bridgestone 175 Hurricane Scrambler
'66 R60/2
'72 BMW 2002
Instagram - jj_withers
Deleted User 287

Re: Bing Flat top carbs vs regular 32mm?

Post by Deleted User 287 »

The only two disadvantages I know of is the diaphragm is held on to the slide with a nylon snap ring instead of a steel washer and screws. The other is that they don't have the big spring on top to push the slide back down, although that has never been a problem for me.

It used to be that Bing did not sell the nylon snap rings. Now they do.

About the only advantage is that they don't have the potential for air leaks around the "button" in the center of the dome on the dome tops.

Flat tops are held in place with only two fasteners. Dome tops four. Less weight on the drag strip.

There might be other advantages/disadvantages. I am about as amateur a mechanic as they come.
User avatar
Jeff in W.C.
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:20 am
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: Bing Flat top carbs vs regular 32mm?

Post by Jeff in W.C. »

justoneoftheguys wrote:Flat tops are held in place with only two fasteners. Dome tops four. Less weight on the drag strip.
The newer 32mm carbs, such as on my '88, have the top held in place by only two fastners.
Jeff in W.C.
1988 R100 RT
2018 R1200 GS
"I've got my motorcycle jacket, but I'm walking all the time." Joe Strummer/Clash
Post Reply