Since I've been posting a few pics today and this question of beauty came up - esp. in relation to the BEAUTIFUL BMW R75/5 - I thought I'd better post a pic of one (ie my Black Beauty).
Narry a granna cycicle be laid an eye upon...
Sorry if the pic might be a little blurry - it was taken while the bike was idling.
Beauty in the eyes
- Zombie Master
- Posts: 8828
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada
Re: Beauty in the eyes
I made no claims that this was an completely original machine. What point are you trying to make? I do know that this bike is a 1970 R75/5.Wayne J in MA wrote:The 1970 R75/5 didn't come with side covers, didn't have the black on the engine emblems and had silver intake tubes but I have seen many that people changed afterwards. It's like the toaster tanks. I saw an ad recently for a 1971 "all original" that had a toaster tank and side covers. I guess the owners interpretation of "all original" is different than mine.
Don't get me wrong, I think people can change their bike to anything they want. Some of these bikes evolve over the years and will do more as parts become harder to source. My '78 sure isn't completely stock.
Any and all disclaimers may apply
Re: Beauty in the eyes
"Completely Stock" - I gave up that concept 2 engines and 1 gearbox ago...Wayne J in MA wrote:The 1970 R75/5 didn't come with side covers, didn't have the black on the engine emblems and had silver intake tubes but I have seen many that people changed afterwards. It's like the toaster tanks. I saw an ad recently for a 1971 "all original" that had a toaster tank and side covers. I guess the owners interpretation of "all original" is different than mine.
Don't get me wrong, I think people can change their bike to anything they want. Some of these bikes evolve over the years and will do more as parts become harder to source. My '78 sure isn't completely stock.

- Zombie Master
- Posts: 8828
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada
Re: Beauty in the eyes
[quote="DucatiPete"]Since I've been posting a few pics today and this question of beauty came up - esp. in relation to the BEAUTIFUL BMW R75/5 - I thought I'd better post a pic of one (ie my Black Beauty).
Handsome machine!
So Ducati Pete: do you agree with my attitude toward the 916?
Handsome machine!
So Ducati Pete: do you agree with my attitude toward the 916?
Any and all disclaimers may apply
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:19 am
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: Beauty in the eyes
Sorry that it came across that way. I should have just left it without the extra comments.Zombie Master wrote:I made no claims that this was an completely original machine. What point are you trying to make? I do know that this bike is a 1970 R75/5.
My point was supposed to be that I loved the bike and how much it was like my bike other than a few differences. Mine was made in 9/70 which is a 1971 model year bike same color scheme.
Wayne
1978 R100S Motorsport
1971 R75/5 SWB
1962 R69S
1978 R100S Motorsport
1971 R75/5 SWB
1962 R69S
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:10 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Beauty in the eyes
I helped a friend with an '88 Suzuki and I sure thought the plastic covering helped the looks of that thing.
- DucatiPete
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 3:10 am
Re: Beauty in the eyes
I agree that the 916 IS a modern classic, despite it not displaying much in the way of "engine casings, header pipes, triple clamps, ect,". But I reckon the PROFILE and DESIGN that it has will stand the test of time for it to be regarded as a BEAUTIFUL motorcycle (in the eyes of the perceptive beholderZombie Master wrote:I read so often about what are considered to be beautiful motorcycles. For example Ducati's 916 comes to mind as a modern classic. Yet for me, any machine that is covered in plastic, has no mechanical presence. I need to see some evidence of engine casings, header pipes, triple clamps, ect, to be moved by the visual presence of a machine. Am I alone here?

However, I'm a bevel man and I like to see 'em out there in the open for all to see - along with chrome headers, contis, clip-ons, and rear-sets. My 1973 Sport is a bastard to ride - hard and uncompromising - but boy is it BEAUTIFUL to behold! (to me

Well that's what i reckon anyhow.
pete
Re: Beauty in the eyes
The Sport is a luverley bike to behold, but it's a bit like the orange Lav750 of the same era. Arse breaker seat and hip stiffener positioning.
The GT750, on the other hand, is just as gorgoeus, and in it's day reasonably affordable.
I had one just like this, but a plain red tank.

The GT750, on the other hand, is just as gorgoeus, and in it's day reasonably affordable.
I had one just like this, but a plain red tank.

Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Re: Beauty in the eyes
My scrotum and its contents are aching just looking at that one!
The engine looks great, but seems a bit too tidied up when compared to the early Duke.

Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.