Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
User avatar
vanzen
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:29 pm
Location: Hidin' in the Hills

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by vanzen »

mattcfish wrote:... None of the lumpy idle, poor low end punch, flat spots and added vibration that I had read about...
With the work done carefully and correctly these things should never be a problem –
Good job, Matt !

Now, about getting out of bed as we used to ...
If only a sport cam and a "rebuild" could solve that problem.
Image
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by Major Softie »

ME 109 wrote:
Major Softie wrote: The long slow gradual loss of power is something we just don't notice.
I notice not being able to get out of bed as easy as I used to.
Yeah, but I'll bet there was a lot of deterioration before you noticed. :mrgreen:
MS - out
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by ME 109 »

Major Softie wrote:Yeah, but I'll bet there was a lot of deterioration before you noticed. :mrgreen:
No way. I banged my head in the same place every morning when the alarm went off.
I don't think I deteriorated, I bought a new bed.
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
George Ryals
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Stone Mountain, GA

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by George Ryals »

Matt, it is truly refreshing to hear a report on modifications as told by a person who has actual personal experience with the modifications. THANKS.
Smile it's contagious!
'74 R90S, '67 /2 Conv w/sc, '66 R50/2
'74 Harley FXE, '72 Harley FLH w/HD sc
'69 BSA 441 Victor Special, '74 R90/6 Basket case
'85 R80RT wreck for parts
User avatar
mattcfish
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by mattcfish »

Major Softie wrote:What was the condition of R90 before you did the work? If it was tired, then you are not doing a fair comparison, and don't try to tell me you remember what it was like before it got tired - our brains just don't work that way. The long slow gradual loss of power is something we just don't notice.

If it was running at full stock power before the work, that's different, but the fact is, people VERY seldom do such hop-ups on a fresh motor - at least, in the Airhead world. The Duc people are all crazy: they throw out fresh stock parts all the time :lol:
I didn't modify the bike because it was broken. It didn't use oil, compression was over 150Lbs on each side, and it had plenty of pep for an R90, honest. After disassembly I did notice that the crank sprocket was ready for replacement, but no chain slap issues. My main complaint had been pinging and not enough punch while passing on steep uphill grades and the clunky shifting of the old heavy flywheel bikes. Stiffness in my hand on the clutch was another factor. You post 81 bike riders don't know how good you've got it when compared to older heavy clutch pull guys. I'm sure my left forarm is going to start shrinking with this new set up.
Other than that I loved the old motor configuration. It got close to 50mpg with Dellortos.
The ball got rolling when a good used 336 cam fell into my lap for $30.00 and a nice low mile 1983 tranny for less than $150.00. I've always been jealous of bikes with Nikasil barrels, so when I couldn't find an affordable way to make Nikasil 900cc jugs the Siebenrock kit became more and more attractive.
Bellingham, WA USA
1975 BMW R90/6
1975 BMW 2002
1971 VW Westfalia
1985 VW Vanagon
http://advrider.com/index.php?threads/b ... s.1074183/
Deleted User 62

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by Deleted User 62 »

George Ryals wrote:Matt, it is truly refreshing to hear a report on modifications as told by a person who has actual personal experience with the modifications. THANKS.
+1 ...and I wish we still had access to ME109s bottom end rebuild.
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by Garnet »

Tim Shepherd wrote:
George Ryals wrote:Matt, it is truly refreshing to hear a report on modifications as told by a person who has actual personal experience with the modifications. THANKS.
+1 ...and I wish we still had access to ME109s bottom end rebuild.
Actually, I'll pass on Jeff's bottom. :?
Garnet

Image
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by Major Softie »

mattcfish wrote: I didn't modify the bike because it was broken. It didn't use oil, compression was over 150Lbs on each side, and it had plenty of pep for an R90, honest. After disassembly I did notice that the crank sprocket was ready for replacement, but no chain slap issues. My main complaint had been pinging and not enough punch while passing on steep uphill grades and the clunky shifting of the old heavy flywheel bikes. Stiffness in my hand on the clutch was another factor. You post 81 bike riders don't know how good you've got it when compared to older heavy clutch pull guys. I'm sure my left forarm is going to start shrinking with this new set up.
Other than that I loved the old motor configuration. It got close to 50mpg with Dellortos.
The ball got rolling when a good used 336 cam fell into my lap for $30.00 and a nice low mile 1983 tranny for less than $150.00. I've always been jealous of bikes with Nikasil barrels, so when I couldn't find an affordable way to make Nikasil 900cc jugs the Siebenrock kit became more and more attractive.
Sounds good then!
MS - out
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by ME 109 »

Garnet wrote:Actually, I'll pass on Jeff's bottom. :?
Right, you can come camping with me Garnet.
Lord of the Bings
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Torque RULES! Yeahhhhhh! 336 Bragging time

Post by ME 109 »

I feel a need to clarify that statement :oops:
But I'll only get mesself in deeper more trouble.
Lord of the Bings
Post Reply