I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...
Large driveshaft?
Re: Large driveshaft?
Re: Large driveshaft?
Does that interfere with the manifesto? Thread degradation is what boxerworks hangs it's jugs on!R65 Rob wrote:I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Re: Large driveshaft?
The spring loaded driveshaft will retrofit to LWB /5, /6, and /7 bikes but the boss on the shaft that supports/stops the coupling mechanism will need a flat ground on each side equal to the diameter of the shaft so that it will fit through the narrow neck of the early swingarms. Easy to do on a belt sander. There is plenty of meat left to support the sprung coupling.
- Steve in Golden
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Golden, CO USA
Re: Large driveshaft?
It was a joke Vanzen.vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...
It's all downhill from here. Except for the uphill bits.
- Steve in Golden
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Golden, CO USA
Re: Large driveshaft?
Now that teo has kindly gotten the thread back on topic, do I still have to pay you to not move it to the speakeasy?R65 Rob wrote:I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...
It's all downhill from here. Except for the uphill bits.
Re: Large driveshaft?
Since you just posted two more OT posts, you will have to pay double! (I work for the SUSG*)Steve in Golden wrote:Now that teo has kindly gotten the thread back on topic, do I still have to pay you to not move it to the speakeasy?R65 Rob wrote:I (or any of my co-mods) would be happy to split this off into a Speakeasy thread.vanzen@rockerboxer.com wrote:Holy sh!t –
talk about thread degradation ... and adolescent self indulgence fantasy ...
*Secret U.S. Government