Today's quiz

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Today's quiz

Post by ME 109 »

Right then.
Electronic ignition bikes.

The 'black box' under the tank, the one that has the heat sink paste.

Why is there a difference with the black box between a bike with kick start, and one without :?:

Does it have to do with altering ignition timing at the slow kick start rpm?
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
jagarra
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:42 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: Today's quiz

Post by jagarra »

I don't know what model you are referring to, but you may be on the right track. First I think that it would be to accommodate being started either way. When you turn the ignition on the bike doesn't know which way it will be started,so I would say the default would be kick start. When you hit the button to engage the starter, more current goes to starter motor, so I would expect a different circuit tapped off the starter circuit is used to amplify power to coils.
1974 R90/6 built 9/73
1987 BMW K75S
1994 BMW R1100RS
1964 T100SR Triumph
1986 Honda XL600R
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Today's quiz

Post by ME 109 »

Ah yes, which model.

81-84.

Quite possibly on the monos as well, if they had a kick start.
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
dougie
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Burlington Ontario, Canada

Re: Today's quiz

Post by dougie »

ME 109 wrote:Ah yes, which model.
81-84.
Quite possibly on the monos as well, if they had a kick start.
Kick start :?: :!: On my Monolever :?: :!:
If it don't start, I give it a good swift kick.
I've spent most of my money on women, motorcycles, and beer.
The rest of it I just wasted.
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Today's quiz

Post by ME 109 »

dougie wrote:
ME 109 wrote:Ah yes, which model.
81-84.
Quite possibly on the monos as well, if they had a kick start.
Kick start :?: :!: On my Monolever :?: :!:
If it don't start, I give it a good swift kick.
That would be kicked start Doug. :idea:
Lord of the Bings
barryh
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Today's quiz

Post by barryh »

In the event of the ignition being left on without starting the electronic black box has a time delay cut out to prevent overheating. Is the delay longer on the kick start version to give the rider time to get his act together ?
barry
Cheshire
England
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Today's quiz

Post by ME 109 »

barryh wrote: Is the delay longer on the kick start version to give the rider time to get his act together ?
:lol: From what I've seen of kick start demonstrations, I'd say your spot on Barry!
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: Today's quiz

Post by SteveD »

Yeah gspd was one with a positive view on the kicker, but I think most people find them next to useless. gspd even had a video on it...Mine will only start the bike if it's well warm, but I don't ever use it to start the bike (anymore that is, demos are turned down).

It can be handy turning the engine over if doing tappets, but not as sensitive as turning the engine from the alternator.

Getting back to the original post, I've heard there was a difference but unsure where from or if it was valid even.
The fiche only show one item...
12 14 2 325 284 IGNITION CONTROL UNIT (from 09/80) $176.54
12 14 2 325 284 IGNITION CONTROL UNIT $176.54...88-on...
http://www.largiader.com/articles/ignition/ Open Anton's page...scroll down a little to the coil/icm bit for some further info.
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
moosehead
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:57 am
Location: Canukstan...north of the checkerboard

Re: Today's quiz

Post by moosehead »

They are indeed different...found out the hard way when substituted non-kicker module on my kicker 81 R100. Think Barry is right abut the delay to coil cutoff. While I could use it for electric start could never kick her over...mind you I never kick her too often and was difficult even with the correct module.

Think Snowbum had something on reason for the difference or maybe Oak...

Why do you ask Jeff....contemplating a "kicker" upgrade to the RS box? :lol:
Retired from work....not life!
Kurt in S.A.
Posts: 1657
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: Today's quiz

Post by Kurt in S.A. »

moosehead wrote:Think Snowbum had something on reason for the difference
Snowbum, in all his verboseness:

"The Ignition Modules (under the tank modules) were initially made in two versions. On these early modules, a spark could occur when the key was first turned on. One version was for the kickstart bikes, one version was for the no-kickstart bikes. The original modules had a timing feature that cut off the current flow AFTER about 5 seconds for the kickstarter equipped bikes, and about 1 second or so for the NO kickstarter equipped bikes. Later this was changed to about 1.5 seconds (UNclear to me, but perhaps this 1.5 was for both...or for the kickstarter equipped bikes...not sure). The kickstart modules timings were originally longer to allow time to kickstart the bike. Which is a bit strange, since engine rotation causes the modules to be triggered anyway. The reasoning behind the shorter cutoff for later models is to lower heating of the coils, which supposedly was THE, or only one of the, causes for the original twin-tower gray coil to fail by cracking. Apparently, some folks would turn on the key, and continue a conversation, without starting the motor. Perhaps some very early modules never had a timer at all. The coil redesign for reliability (no more cracking) did not result in any change in the electrical characteristics of the coil."

I even threw in the coloring just so you could get the "full" effect!

Kurt in S.A.
Post Reply