This could be it boys. We'll be able to pinch our nose as we pass Rob V's stink machine!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b04ae/b04ae580d64645de1db161c4b55dc54c81db6699" alt="Cool 8-)"
That was my concern when considering a Prius C. If the battery goes, it costs about $3000bbelk wrote:My question is what is the battery life and does the battery cost more than the gasoline it saved.
If you look at the specs, you'll notice that the battery life is estimated at over 200,000 miles (when it drops to 80% of original capacity), so that isn't really the issue with these. The real issue is range. If I lived in a city, I could totally see the Zero S as being a practical vehicle (ESPECIALLY if I could plug in at work), but where I live, it could never leave my small town, so it isn't really practical yet.dougie wrote:That was my concern when considering a Prius C. If the battery goes, it costs about $3000bbelk wrote:My question is what is the battery life and does the battery cost more than the gasoline it saved.
+1Major Softie wrote: As far as adjusting to the idea of an electric motorcycle, I don't think I'd have that much trouble getting used to 70 ft-lbs. of torque from a standing start in a 300 lb. motorcycle.
Exactly. Yet, I understand what the issue is there too: they don't expect people to pony up the big bucks for anything less than the top performing model, and the big battery packs add a lot of cost. Still, if they designed the bikes so that any battery pack would fit, then you could choose according to your own price/performance priorities.Sibbo wrote:It does seem possible that should someone decide to build a bike with a little more weight and say double the battery pack range would become quite acceptable, especially if you could recharge at work.