Modifying R90/6 front forks

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
User avatar
jagarra
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:42 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by jagarra »

I ordered a set of the BMW HD springs, hope they arrive this week. Checked my notes, looks like I put in 9.6 oz of 15 wt fluid in the forks. That's what my factory manual called for.
Duane, I did look over your article on checking alignment. Have to figure out how to make a holder for the dial indicator so I can check parallelism of the tubes.
1974 R90/6 built 9/73
1987 BMW K75S
1994 BMW R1100RS
1964 T100SR Triumph
1986 Honda XL600R
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1814
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by melville »

jagarra wrote:I ordered a set of the BMW HD springs, hope they arrive this week. Checked my notes, looks like I put in 9.6 oz of 15 wt fluid in the forks. That's what my factory manual called for.
Duane, I did look over your article on checking alignment. Have to figure out how to make a holder for the dial indicator so I can check parallelism of the tubes.
This is a piece of AL angle, drilled and tapped for the pin from my magnetic base:

Image

And here it is in use, checking parallelosity:

Image

I got the AL from the local Boiler Works, who stock all sorts of metal. As a leftover bit, it was just $2 IIRC.

I'm running 7.5 wt Bel Ray oil in my /6 and liking it a lot. Is there a chance the 15 wt is pumping down (not rebounding quickly enough) and that's what's eating your ground clearance? That said, there can be tremendous variation among oils of different brands.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
Mal S7
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:26 am

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by Mal S7 »

15 wt oil is your problem.
Way too viscose for airhead forks.

I have had joy with Sonic springs, apparently a similar rate to the HD BMW springs, but non-progressive.
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by chasbmw »

Mal S7 wrote:15 wt oil is your problem.
Way too viscose for airhead forks.

I have had joy with Sonic springs, apparently a similar rate to the HD BMW springs, but non-progressive.

+1
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
jagarra
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:42 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by jagarra »

Thanks, never entered my mind that the oil was too thick. This is a new one on me, I always equated stiffer compression with heavier oil. I'll try some 7 1/2 wt .

gg
1974 R90/6 built 9/73
1987 BMW K75S
1994 BMW R1100RS
1964 T100SR Triumph
1986 Honda XL600R
boocephus
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:58 pm

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by boocephus »

On a side note, if the fork is leaking at the bottom, is the copper washer the only thing that seals it? My '71 was not forking right and I found that most of the oil leaked out of one leg. I added some and it leaked out again.
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by chasbmw »

The copper washer is on the inside, to replace it you have to drop the slider, replace it with a smear of Hylomar and it should stay dry. The wavey washer goes on the outside.
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
Duane Ausherman
Posts: 6008
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:39 pm
Location: Galt California
Contact:

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by Duane Ausherman »

Yep, 15 is way to heavy, even 10 of the brand that we tried was too heavy. Depending upon the brand, either 5 or 71/2 is the way to go if everything is stock. Rider weight and riding style can cause one to want a change. For 95% of the riders the stock stuff is the way to go.

Don't be one of those that is convinced that you know more than the factory. You may, but in my early days I was changing lots of stuff. For most of those, I realized that I was just trying to pump up my ego with "smarter" changes. I wasn't smarter.

At least I didn't go out and swap out the engine for something larger, like a VW. That would have been the height of foolishness. I heard about it though.

I have a few spare lower trees that I could cut up. As soon as I discover which ones are too bent up to use, then I will do some cutting.
Ask the Indians what happens when you don't control immigration.
User avatar
mattcfish
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by mattcfish »

Luftmeister HD springs (probably the same as OE HD), 5 wt oil, no pre-load spacers, 190Lb rider. Handles great (I really flog this cow), lots of travel, never bottoms out. Heavier oil just increases damping and slows down the suspension.
Bellingham, WA USA
1975 BMW R90/6
1975 BMW 2002
1971 VW Westfalia
1985 VW Vanagon
http://advrider.com/index.php?threads/b ... s.1074183/
Duane Ausherman
Posts: 6008
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:39 pm
Location: Galt California
Contact:

Re: Modifying R90/6 front forks

Post by Duane Ausherman »

There are two quick tests for fork alignment, static and dynamic. I would always do both before taking it apart.

Static is the measure of how it returns to neutral while bouncing the front end.

The dynamic test is while riding it.

Did you run the "vibration test" of the fork alignment? While riding, reach down with your left hand and grab the fork tube just above the lower casting. You should feel the forks going up and down so fast that you can't count it. The lower legs (castings) will be bumping your hand so fast and never stop doing it. If you feel it move once or twice a second, you have sticktion. Fix it.
Ask the Indians what happens when you don't control immigration.
Post Reply