bent forks R75/5

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Duane Ausherman
Posts: 6008
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:39 pm
Location: Galt California
Contact:

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Duane Ausherman »

I have lots of used ones for sale that are straight. I have been selling them on eBay.

Are you willing to do the entire alignment procedure?
Ask the Indians what happens when you don't control immigration.
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4910
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by SteveD »

Duane, equipo5 is Ian. He'll be doing a complete front end sorting. He read Randy's article a while back.
The top plate is headed his way tomorrow if he's home.
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Mal S7
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:26 am

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Mal S7 »

I have replaced one tube due to chrome wear with an italian made one bought from motobins.
Quality seems good and it was cheaper and quicker to buy new than getting the old one re-chromed.
User avatar
equipo5
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:43 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by equipo5 »

Are you willing to do the entire alignment procedure?
"Yes I am."
Rite of passage really. I would be delighted to buy your tubes Duane. Let me know how to proceed.
I have replaced one tube due to chrome wear with an italian made one bought from motobins.
Thanks for the feedback Mal.

Cheers
Ian
1970 R75/5
User avatar
jjwithers
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: Ventura, CA
Contact:

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by jjwithers »

chasbmw wrote:Various changes in ATE damper rods, mainly to improve damping and to reduce valve noise. Later would be better than /5 rods. But you can fit the later damper valve rings to the earlier forks.
i have been thinking about improving the stock /5 forks somehow but I don't want to go with Gold Valve emulators or anything like that.
I want to cure the 'dive' that can happen when braking but I don't want to stiffen the suspension too much (potholes are rampant here). Lately i have been wondering if throwing late 70's dampener and springs into /5 fork tubes would help.
Has anybody had any success with such a swap?
Or are there any other tricks to improve /5 fork handling? I'm not looking for race suspension, just less 'dive' and spongy effects yet able to swallow potholes.

-J
www.beemersandbits.com
'77 R100S - http://www.joshuawithers.com/r100s
'73 /5 Toaster Cafe bike http://www.joshwithers.com/slash5
'67 Bridgestone 175 Hurricane Scrambler
'66 R60/2
'72 BMW 2002
Instagram - jj_withers
ME 109
Posts: 7306
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by ME 109 »

JJ, perhaps increasing the oil quantity in each for will assist?

Perhaps Duane can advise.
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
Ken in Oklahoma
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Ken in Oklahoma »

There are anti-dive springs that used to be marketed back in the day. IIRC they slipped over the damper rod. One of my airheads has them. I never did notice any significant difference, though I never made any real effort to determine if there actually was a difference.

Ken
____________________________________
There's no such thing as too many airheads
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

The later ATE forks can be set up to use with RT fairings et. Etc, so the damping is much better, if you pm me your email I will send you an article all about the changes in /6 forks. Don't renew the metal wiper rings as the ones produced are oversized and will cause fork stiction. I was chasing my tail for ages on this one and ended up getting the damper pistons machined for the later post 81 plastic piston seals, and my stiction was gone.

Image

Many people reckon that part of the instability issues with /5 and early /6s was partly due to lack of damping in the forks.
Last edited by chasbmw on Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
Ken in Oklahoma
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by Ken in Oklahoma »

chasbmw wrote:The later ATE forks can be set up to use with RT fairings et. Etc, so the damping is much better, if you pm me your email I will send you an article all about the changes in /6 forks. Don't renew the metal wiper rings as the ones produced are oversized and will cause fork stiction. I was chasing my tail for ages on this one and ended up getting the damper pistons machined for the later post 81 plastic piston seals.

Many people reckon that part of the instability issues with /5 and early /6s was partly due to lack of damping in the forks.
I find that interesting Charles. Would it be feasible to copy and past the info into a post here?

Ken
____________________________________
There's no such thing as too many airheads
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: bent forks R75/5

Post by chasbmw »

Happy to send individually.....UK BMW club info and they are a bit precious about it
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
Post Reply