Yes, 82-84
Photo of the machined damper rods
bent forks R75/5
Re: bent forks R75/5
Thanks! Just to confirm, it's part # 31 42 1 241 649 "guide ring" correct?
Re: bent forks R75/5
Another question Charles, do you recall if the groove was just machined wider to fit the new ring, or was it also made deeper as well? It's the last thing we need to do to get my friends R100/7 back on the road!
Re: bent forks R75/5
I think that the groove was not deepened, I would machine it wider to take the plastic ring and then fit. On my bike it's a fairly loose fit, the ring not compressed much.
Re: bent forks R75/5
Ok, so probably a dumb question: So why not decrease the width of the new plastic ring? I have to believe that would require less machining than the steel damper rods. Maybe even use abrasive paper on a sheet of glass for the plastic.
1971 R50/5, 1980 R100T,
CRF 300 Rally, CRF 250F,
1947 James ML
CRF 300 Rally, CRF 250F,
1947 James ML
Re: bent forks R75/5
I think the plastic (nylon?) rings are wider because they will wear faster than the thinner steel rings.daz wrote:Ok, so probably a dumb question: So why not decrease the width of the new plastic ring?
Re: bent forks R75/5
I liked the way that sounded so much that I had to google it and I will be forever greatfull because I found this:Airbear wrote: a bingle with a cow
1975 R90/6
1979 R65
1979 R65
Re: bent forks R75/5
Ahhh...Lara! An airhead in the vacuous sense! There are other similarities to our favourite bikes too!
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Victoria, S.E.Oz.
1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.