A Chueyism

If you want to see a particular theme of pictures posted start a thread for it. Your pictures just MIGHT end up on the Boxerworks front page in the Gallery slideshow. That said, the RULES are as follows.....
1. try to keep it Motorcycle related please.
2. NO PORN, it can be sexy but no nekkid stuff
3. NO items for sale
Post Reply
Deleted User 287

A Chueyism

Post by Deleted User 287 »

.
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Chuey »

Wouldn't it read better as: "Don't let my safety interfere with your phone call"?

You know, it is illegal in California to be on a hand held phone. Still, there are about ten percent of the drivers I see on hand held phones. There was an editorial in a newspaper I saw. The author was congratulating the Calif. legislature, maybe Jerry Brown, the governor, himself, that they had resisted increasing the fines for hand held phone tickets. His logic was that tickets are getting out of hand, money wise. I would like to see it increased to where the car is taken away and the driver license is revoked for at least four years. Then, we would see a reduction in hand held car phoning. Texting, blow up the car on the spot and never drive again. I don't see this as cruel or unusual, but an attempt to remove a totally unnecessary risk factor from the roadways.

Chuey
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Garnet »

Same law in BC with about the same compliance rate. Some people are just too importanat to not be on the phone.

I think the phone ban has made it more dangerous as people now hold their phones down i their lap whilst texting, so they are even more distracted.
Garnet

Image
Deleted User 287

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Deleted User 287 »

Or the government could automatically draft them into Army ground forces and ship them off to the Middle East to protect "our" oil.
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Sibbo »

I'm all in favour of forcible phone insertion in the appropriate orifice .
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Chuey »

Sibbo wrote:I'm all in favour of forcible phone insertion in the appropriate orifice .
Would that be with full synthetic or dino oil for lube?

Chuey
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1842
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: A Chueyism

Post by melville »

Chuey wrote:
Sibbo wrote:I'm all in favour of forcible phone insertion in the appropriate orifice .
Would that be with full synthetic or dino oil for lube?

Chuey
No lube in this case.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Sibbo »

Chuey wrote:
Sibbo wrote:I'm all in favour of forcible phone insertion in the appropriate orifice .
Would that be with full synthetic or dino oil for lube?

Chuey
Lube ? Ya reckon ? ;)
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: A Chueyism

Post by Chuey »

I'm not saying I'm a marketing genius or anything, but if the "appropriate orifice" system ever gets in place, you could make a tidy sum by marketing "pre-lubed cell phones" for those who decide that their phone call is more important that others' safety.

Chuey
Post Reply