Ring Gaps - again

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Post Reply
kutter
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:50 pm
Location: Central Queensland, Australia

Ring Gaps - again

Post by kutter »

Working on the left cylinder of my 1981 R100RS (Nikasil).
No lip at all in top of cylinder, just a little bit of carbon.
Can still see the hone marks on the bore.
Piston (full dome 9.5 to 1 ?) stamped 93.97. Read all I can find
on Snowbum, this site and adv rider. Original top ring gap in
cylinder 0.58mm at upper edge of wear limit. New rings (Motobins)
top compression ring gap 0.45mm good.
Oil ring single rail will internal coil spring end gap 0.45mm . :?:
Clymers states (P198 - all other models) 0.25 - 0.40 mm.
Also Snowbum states that iron bores and Nikasil bores do not
use the same material in the rings.
My new rings state R100/7 T, R100 T/C . Are these the correct rings
or have I got the wrong parts . Bins was given 5/81 R100RS and VIN 6077429.
Got to track down some Threebond for the cylinder sealant as yet.
Have read all about how to do it. I am presuming that the sealant has to be applied
to the cylinder base as well as to the crankcase. This is not mentioned anywhere
that I have able to find. Most sealants require both surfaces to be coated.
Advice, experiences , how you did it ???
been able
3/85 R80 Mono
5/81 R100RS - Shed Find

kutter
Rockhampton
Queensland
Australia
ME 109
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by ME 109 »

Don't know about the ring gaps Kutter, but with the three bond, I apply to the engine casing only.
Not much at all, but a consistent amount all around. Any excess eventually will be found in your oil filter.
Lord of the Bings
montmil
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:41 am
Location: Denton, Texas

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by montmil »

Cylinder base to crankcase sealant: Where and how much.
http://www.gunsmoke.com/motorcycling/r1 ... index.html
1981 R65
1983 R65
1978 R100S
1995 Triumph Trophy
Duane Ausherman
Posts: 6008
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:39 pm
Location: Galt California
Contact:

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by Duane Ausherman »

The ideal ring gap is about .003" for each inch of piston diameter. Your gaps are a bit much, but I have found that they generally seal at those gaps. I have a few time put together an engine out of old parts and used rings that were far worse and they sealed up OK.

Too small is quite dangerous, as they will break and score the cylinder.
Ask the Indians what happens when you don't control immigration.
georgesgiralt
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:53 pm

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by georgesgiralt »

Hello !
Check that the rings have not too much play in their grooves.
This is THE limit; If too much play, the rings will rattle and break ruining the cylinders...
Also, clean as much as you can of carbon deposit into the grooves of piston. This carbon build up prevent the rings to rotate properly and cause rapid wear....
kutter
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:50 pm
Location: Central Queensland, Australia

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by kutter »

Yes, I have cleaned the carbon from the ring grooves
and the side clearances are at minimum specs.
Tracked down some Three Bond 1104 as used to seal crankcases
by the local Yamaha dealer.
Thanx for all of your input.!
3/85 R80 Mono
5/81 R100RS - Shed Find

kutter
Rockhampton
Queensland
Australia
User avatar
George Ryals
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Stone Mountain, GA

Re: Ring Gaps - again

Post by George Ryals »

Remember there is no clearance between the cyl and case. If you think you don't have enough sealer on it you probably have too much
Smile it's contagious!
'74 R90S, '67 /2 Conv w/sc, '66 R50/2
'74 Harley FXE, '72 Harley FLH w/HD sc
'69 BSA 441 Victor Special, '74 R90/6 Basket case
'85 R80RT wreck for parts
Post Reply